While a more detailed article is forthcoming that addresses many of the major arguments for this position, this brief article will highlight a few examples of where these alternate temple site proponents misuse Scripture, history, and archaeology. However, when we compare their claims to the Bible, history, and archaeology, we find that Martin and Cornuke have been highly selective in their use of each of these sources.
Both authors claim to be following the Bible, historical sources, and archaeology to uncover truths that have been forgotten for centuries.
1 Bob Cornuke published Temple in 2014 to promote the same idea, although with a much smaller temple and temple mount.
Ernest Martin sparked the alternate temple site movement when he published The Temples that Jerusalem Forgot in 2000.
0 kommentar(er)
